Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68271 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2006 03:06:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 2006 03:06:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 39666 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2006 03:06:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 38932 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2006 03:06:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 38921 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2006 03:06:23 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:06:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [128.200.73.41] (HELO relay1.es.uci.edu) (128.200.73.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:01:26 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (CPE-75-81-100-161.kc.res.rr.com [75.81.100.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay1.es.uci.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBV312UT005304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:01:05 -0800 X-UCInetID: tharmon In-Reply-To: <000e01c72c82$8acc6490$2f067a46@jayb> References: <000e01c72c82$8acc6490$2f067a46@jayb> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0559401F-7115-47F9-B97D-F4379E3C7D50@vocaro.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Trevor Harmon Subject: Re: Custom processor for Xslt task? Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:00:41 -0600 To: "Ant Users List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 30, 2006, at 8:22 PM, Jay Bryant wrote: > I get Ant to work with Saxon with tasks similar to this one: > > > > Disregarding my issue for a moment, I don't understand how this could possibly work. Okay, so the Saxon JAR is on the classpath. We could even assume it's the very first entry on the classpath. But how does Ant know to use Saxon and not Xalan? I don't see anything in the above snippet that tells Ant to use a different processor. How can it work without specifying the Saxon factory class? Trevor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org