ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manish Marathe <mumara...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: running tests for ant 1.6.4
Date Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:50:55 GMT
On 11/15/05, Manish Marathe <mumarathe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/15/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert <antoine@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Manish,
> > when I built ant 1.6.4 all these tests passed.
> > JarTest should definitively pass.
> > Can you show the stack trace ?
> > The problem might be, that the tests might have run against the already
> > installed version of ant ?
> >
> > When I do a build, I do it this way.
> >
> > set ANT_HOME=whereever I want ant installed
> > rm -rf bootstrap
> > ./build.sh -D"test.haltonfailure=false" install-lite test
> >
> > (install-lite is like install, just you do not generate the javadoc).
> > When you do it this way, ant gets installed before you run the tests so
> > you are really running the tests against what you have built.
> > I think someone filed a bug rep in bugzilla to ask that we improve our
> > build.sh or our build.xml to make sure that the tests run against the
> > newly built classes or jars even if you did not install them.
> >
>
Hello Antoine,

I followed the exact steps as you suggested. I am attaching stack trace of
the tests which have failed. Some have failed because of missing .NET apps.
I don't know what that means..

Let me know your suggestion.

Thanks

-Manish
SpikeSource, Inc.
http://developer.spikesource.com

Mime
View raw message