ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <hind.lwahh...@accenture.com>
Subject RE: difference between runtarget and antcall?
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:29:54 GMT
Thank you for the detailed information.i think i am going to stick to the antcall task.

________________________________

From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:ddevienne@gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 6/22/2005 4:59 PM
To: 'Ant Users List'
Subject: RE: difference between runtarget and antcall?



> From: Burgess, Benjamin [mailto:BBurgess@tiaa-cref.org]
>
> Antcall creates a new project.  Runtarget does not.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hind.lwahhabi@accenture.com [mailto:hind.lwahhabi@accenture.com]
>
> 'lo gentle people!
> does somebody know the difference between <runtarget> from antcontrib
> and <antcall>.

Which means that <antcall> is slower but safer. The two main differences
(beside speed) is that properties set during the <antcall> do not propagate
to the parent project (are not visible past the <antcall>), and <antcall>
honors the called target's dependencies, whereas <runtarget> does not (the
dependent targets executed depend on which targets where already executed at
the time of the <antcall>).

That's why <runtarget> is not in Ant proper. It's dangerous, and you have to
be an experienced Ant users to understand its tradeoffs (speed v.s.
safety/correctness). --DD


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org





This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary,
or otherwise private information.  If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


Mime
View raw message