From user-return-48987-apmail-ant-user-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Sat Mar 05 20:38:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17991 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2005 20:38:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2005 20:38:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 67032 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2005 20:38:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 66988 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2005 20:38:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 66975 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2005 20:38:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of brian.colfer@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.206 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:38:00 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so1464858rne for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:37:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=hLzw2wZv1Dqvj6GfKs3lPjLF19tIMYtkFT6K6bPPqrxAdKYPFTW4kSLLDWzRZGbauUpen5CR0aY/Wk350Tx0/wAh2uHMYmwkO/FMG0PqcEloCaRVbjUQ+4sKJY5RqvISGYlMkVvcjOS0iWP0ad8dDpDUitLz7V//0yk1rLk8eJo= Received: by 10.38.163.52 with SMTP id l52mr117412rne; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:37:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.65.39 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:37:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92e9d52c0503051237431a356@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:37:58 -0800 From: Brian Colfer Reply-To: Brian Colfer To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: fixing crlf without changing timestamp In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N What version control system are you using? Many will do this automatically... I can only think of build avoidence as the reason to fake out the time stamp... Do you really want to do this? On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:02:10 -0800, michael sorens wrote: > Is it possible to run without changing a file's modification time? Or perhaps a way to use to restore the original modification time after the (on a group of files)? I actually want to run fixcrlf in conjunction with copy (which has the preservelastmodified attribute to retain the modification time) but I see no way to do this. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org > > -- ============================ Brian Colfer Brian.Colfer@gmail.com BrianColfer@comcast.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org