ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Russell Johannesson" <russell_johannes...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: How to supress output
Date Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:27:11 GMT
>From: "Dominique Devienne" <DDevienne@lgc.com>
>Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <user@ant.apache.org>
>To: "Ant Users List" <user@ant.apache.org>
>Subject: RE: How to supress output
>Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:09:33 -0600
>
> > From: Russell Johannesson [mailto:russell_johannesson@hotmail.com]
> >
> > It occurs to me that the problem under discussion isn't necessarily
> > specific
> > to ClearCase. Wouldn't any task which employs Runtime.exec()
>internally
> > potentially be a source of unwanted output? Would it be reasonable to
> > request that there be control over the exec output of all such tasks?
>That
> > way, having ClearCase wouldn't be necessary for testing.
>
>Sounds like a good idea. If you could nest <filterreader>s inside
><exec>, you'd have some control over the output. Don't know how that
>would mesh with <redirector> through. --DD

Perhaps it could be done with filters. The <exec> task's output can be 
redirected with the output attribute. I was referring to any and all other 
tasks that may use Runtime.exec internally.

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar  get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message