Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27007 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 22:26:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 22:26:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 26358 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2004 22:26:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 26262 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2004 22:26:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 26249 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2004 22:26:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [134.132.72.99] (HELO junior.lgc.com) (134.132.72.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:26:17 -0700 Received: from lgchvw01.lgc.com (lgchvw01.lgc.com [134.132.93.107]) by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with SMTP id i6KMQA822648 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:26:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 134.132.93.152 by lgchvw01.lgc.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:26:06 -0500 Received: by lgchexchbh.ad.lgc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:26:05 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dominique Devienne To: "'Ant Users List'" Subject: RE: optional task jars Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:26:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Nicolas Mailhot [mailto:Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net] > > I much prefer the normal Ant distro myself, on any platform. --DD > > Well obviously a CVS-controlled centralized platform-independent Ant is > restricted to a limited number of people. And (I'm not judging you, life > is not perfect, sometime meeting targets means taking ugly shortcuts) > you took the cheap way out - identifying the problem in the distribution > ant and getting it fixed upstream would have been better for everyone in > the long run. This is I guess where we disagree. I don't find any problem in the official Ant distro. It works for me everywhere. I don't see any ugly shortcuts either. This is a solution that works across a company to provide an appropriate Ant version for all platforms necessary. Anybody can put Ant, supercharged with a few AntLibs, under SCM system and share it across developers. I'd be suspicious of any commercial shops using Ant not doing that for that matter. >From the little I understand of this Linux-specific repackaging of Ant, I see a Linux specific solution, which appears to me must be implemented correctly on every developer's Linux box. When I contrast this to simply updating a build tools CVS sandbox, on any platform, well, I don't see this as an improvement. But it's all probably because I'm Linux illiterate, and I'm missing something obviously. Just shows me how ignorant I am, and how much more learning I have to do ;-) --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org