Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4480 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 21:45:02 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 21:45:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 58072 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2004 21:44:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 57887 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2004 21:44:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 57874 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 21:44:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO empburexch.burlington.emptoris.com) (63.111.224.173) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 21:44:41 -0000 Received: by empburexch.burlington.emptoris.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1YRBNGJG>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:43:54 -0500 Message-ID: <15717BB71A5CD411A01600508BDCC2E2021C1D53@empburexch.burlington.emptoris.com> From: "Ciramella, EJ" To: 'Ant Users List' Subject: War update = true Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:43:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3FB1F.4BDB0A30" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3FB1F.4BDB0A30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Has anyone else noticed that the war task with the update="true" setting takes longer than simply recreating the war? I've been testing this by running my war building task, then changing one jsp file, then re-running my war building task. On average, it's 10 - 15 seconds faster to build the war from scratch than to update it. Am I missing a setting somewhere? ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3FB1F.4BDB0A30--