ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chappell, Simon P" <>
Subject RE: Best Practices ANT
Date Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:23:49 GMT

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keith Hatton []
>Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:16 AM
>To: Ant Users List
>Subject: RE: Best Practices ANT
>I recall that EJBs are supposed to be in individual JAR files, 
>so I think that combining them into a single JAR file would be 
>classified as a Bad Thing(tm).
>I don't think it's a Bad Thing, otherwise the deployment 
>descriptor wouldn't allow for it :)
>It's fair enough to package related EJBs together.

Ok, I'll sign on for that. I don't do any _real_ EJB work at this time, so I could have avoided
the issue, but it was so tempting to stick that foot in my mouth! :-)

>It's also fair enough (getting back to the original point of 
>the thread) to have the WAR file build depend on the EJB build 
>- particularly, for example, if the servlets or JSPs make 
>calls to those EJBs. And building an EAR file depends on both 
>those tasks. Obviously having the dependencies the other way 
>round would not make sense.

Agreed. Dependencies upon base components is to be expected. But base components, should not
be dependent upon who/what actually uses them.



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message