Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96815 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 14:45:45 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 14:45:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 26951 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2003 14:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 26825 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2003 14:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 26811 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 14:45:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ncspsmtp2.ncs.com) (159.182.31.5) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 14:45:30 -0000 Received: from iowacexchbrg.ic.ncs.com (Not Verified[10.25.4.190]) by ncspsmtp2.ncs.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v5.5.4.16) id ; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 09:45:14 -0500 Received: by iowacexchbrg.ic.ncs.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:45:11 -0500 Message-ID: <6F3CF8F7047E374CAF4DCED3ED14576E0199E7A9@iowacexch4.ic.ncs.com> From: "Shackelford, John-Mason" To: 'Ant Users List' Subject: RE: project dependency Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:45:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefan et all > separating the issues just feels better. Agreed--and using a Path / FileSet / FileList to specify build order makes for very clean interface. Any idea whether Dominique's BuildPathResolver stuff will wind up in a release anytime soon or are we better of to just write a task that will create the path (e.g. ). I suppose one could even subclass the Path type and added the new functionaliy so that the new tag could be nested in subant just like a static path--of course this approach would only attempt to solve the same problem Dominique's code does and it feels like a hack. What do you fellows think? What is the safest bet in terms of our solution working without hacks to an ant release? John-Mason Shackelford Software Developer Pearson Educational Measurement - eMeasurement Group 2510 North Dodge St. Iowa City, IA 52245 ph. 319-354-9200x6214 john-mason.shackelford@pearson.com http://etest.ncspearson.com **************************************************************************** This email may contain confidential material. If you were not an intended recipient, Please notify the sender and delete all copies. We may monitor email to and from our network. **************************************************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org