Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98073 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 15:22:26 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 15:22:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 87324 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2003 15:22:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 87091 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2003 15:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 87072 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 15:22:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.171) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 15:22:10 -0000 Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A6tfA-0007IB-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:22:12 +0200 Received: from [217.88.245.39] (helo=cyberspaceroad.com) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1A6tfA-0000WC-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:22:12 +0200 Message-ID: <3F82D9FD.3050901@cyberspaceroad.com> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:21:33 +0200 From: Adam Hardy Reply-To: user@ant.apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Bodewig CC: user@ant.apache.org, ant-contrib-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ant-contrib-developers] foreach References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10/07/2003 07:57 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Matthew Inger wrote: >>OK. I see what you mean, however, the output is controlled >>via ANT's execution mechanism. > > It is controlled via the BuildListeners. Are buildlisteners configurable in what they output? > (ab)uses internally, the result is that for each > iteration you get an invocation of , thus the target gets > started once per iteration and you get the target's label once per > iteration using DefaultLogger. > > If you switched to something like NoBannerLogger, you wouldn't get any > target labels at all. > > >>ANT-CONTRIB cannot control what is output from that. The output is >>part of the core definition of the "Target" class. > > could try to use a BuildLogger of its own rather than the > DefaultLogger and suppress the targetStarted events, but that would be > cumbersome to say the least. Probably even impossible. I take it that is something that would require code changes and isn't configurable? >>Talk to the ant-dev team if this bothers you, as we have no control >>over it. > > And I've just sent Adam over to ant-contrib-dev for questions about > , tss. 8-) > I see the thread is being cc'd to the ant-user list anyway. -- ant 1.6alpha + java 1.4.2 on Linux 2.4.20 RH9 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org