Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55772 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 15:03:04 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 15:03:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 76629 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2003 15:02:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 76480 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2003 15:02:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 76374 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 15:02:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web10101.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.130.51) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 15:02:17 -0000 Message-ID: <20031021150215.66034.qmail@web10101.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.179.64.11] by web10101.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:02:15 PDT Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:02:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Amit Kulkarni Reply-To: proudlyindian@yahoo.com Subject: RE: multiple args to java task To: Ant Users List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > If you haven�t a complex start procedure for the decompiler maybe you > > can use here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... maybe we should give the ability to start java apps ... > > Discussed before (at least a couple time I can remember), and rejected on > the grounds that a custom task should be written instead... I disagree, so > if you want to raise it up again, I'll support you ;-) Yeah rejected coz i dont think there is a way to execute above apply task in a loop where in each time in the loop the fileset gets a different jar file. Also below u talked about putting the classpath in command line argument for java, but wot abt the windoze limit of only allowing 1024 chars in the command line ? thanks > Given the new though, I can see how it would be easy to emulate > one. Peter, can I with say that the macro can take an optional > ? Examples I've seen with macros so far had child elements to > contain other elements to be passed to some internal task to the macro. I'm > thinking of declaring a macro with an optional , that would be > to feed on the command line of "java" executed by . > Sounds feasible? Otherwise I'm pretty sure I'll hack up a task one of these > days... --DD > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org