Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 6237 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2003 19:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 6172 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2003 19:47:16 -0000 Received: from junior.lgc.com (134.132.72.99) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2003 19:47:16 -0000 Received: from lgchvw01.lgc.com (lgchvw01.lgc.com [134.132.93.107]) by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with SMTP id h6MJkCo20273 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:46:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 134.132.93.152 by lgchvw01.lgc.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:47:16 -0500 Received: by lgchexchbh.ad.lgc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:47:16 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dominique Devienne To: "'Ant Users List'" Subject: RE: viewcvs or ant? (FAO Dominique) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:47:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Must be something that triggers some kind of bug in the parsing code, or a JDK-specific issue with the threaded pumping of the output/error streams, or whatever... I don't know. Like I said, submit a bug, maybe with your CVS log output so someone can debug the parsing code? Fancy looking into it yourself? Since it's working OK for me, this is not an itch that I'm likely to scratch. Plus I'm really busy these days ;-) Cheers, --DD PS: You could also the perl ChangeLog??? > -----Original Message----- > From: Euan Guttridge [mailto:EGuttridge@buildonline.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:37 PM > To: 'Ant Users List' > Subject: RE: viewcvs or ant? (FAO Dominique) > > > Hi Dominique, > > I would still be interested in your thoughts on why this is happening: > > > > It took 10 seconds for CVS to run the log command.. Surely > Ant would not take 1.5 hours just to parse and style? > > Thanks > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:DDevienne@lgc.com] > Sent: 18 July 2003 17:18 > To: 'Ant Users List' > Subject: RE: viewcvs or ant? > > > Took 10 minutes for me on a sandbox with 24,000 files (lets > assume 1/3 to 1/2 are generated)... People have complained > before that Ant's parsing of the CVS command output is long, > compared to the Perl version of ChangeLog for example. > > Run Ant's ChangeLog task in verbose or debug mode to pick up > the cvs command executed, CTRL-C, then execute the same > command from the prompt, redirecting the output to a file. > Compare the time it took to the time ChangeLog takes, and > you'll have an idea of the overhead of the parsing and > styling of the change log. --DD > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Euan Guttridge [mailto:EGuttridge@buildonline.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:42 AM > > To: 'Ant Users List' > > Subject: RE: viewcvs or ant? > > > > p.s. is there a way to speed it up, it is taking 1.5 hours > to process > > approx 3000 files?Scope is set to last 7 days. > > > > Thanks > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org