ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: <antcall> vs. ant target
Date Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:09:53 GMT
Right, I am wanting something enforceable.  But I
really only care to enforce the <antcall> when
necessary.  So I think failing if my intermediate
properties are already set is adequate.

Thanks,
Matt

--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <antoine@antbuild.com> wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Benson" <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:19 PM
> 
> 
> > Has anyone come up with a way to know whether a
> target
> > was invoked via <antcall>?  Nothing leaps out at
> me...
> >
> You can adopt the convention to add specific
> parameters when you use
> <antcall/> using the nested <param/> element. Of
> course, this is only a
> convention, not something that one can enforce
> easily.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> user-help@ant.apache.org
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message