Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 58823 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2003 18:11:38 -0000 Received: from junior.lgc.com (134.132.72.99) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2003 18:11:38 -0000 Received: from lgchvw01.lgc.com (lgchvw01.lgc.com [134.132.93.107]) by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with SMTP id h3OIAa504739 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:10:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 134.132.93.152 by lgchvw01.lgc.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:11:42 -0500 Received: by lgchexchbh.ad.lgc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:11:42 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dominique Devienne To: "'Ant Users List'" Subject: RE: Help, difficulty with path names in NT2000. Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:11:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Did you really try with the property declared like below? exec.dir = D:/Program Files/Personal Programs/User5/234/Execs This should work. If it doesn't, run Ant with -verbose, so you/we can see the actual command executed. I doubt Ant cannot deal with spaces in this case. Send the verbose output to the list if it still fails. --DD > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Talebbeik [mailto:sam777t@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 12:49 PM > To: user@ant.apache.org > Subject: Help, difficulty with path names in NT2000. > > I am using Ant on NT2000 with Ant 1.4.1 and Java 1.3.1. > I have a NT path name property . I can not use the this path for > executing my binary. It seems like Ant does not like NT paths > with spaces in them. Here is the property value in the property file: > > exec.dir="D:\\Program Files\\Personal Programs\\User5\\234\\Execs" > > Here is how I try to execute in the build.xml: > > > > > > > > > I keep getting the message that the directory specified can not be found. > I have tried other schemes such as single quote, no quote, forward > slash etc. and all of them have failed so far. Does anyone have any ideas > ? > > Thanks.