ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan.Mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de
Subject AW: AW: Anyone written an Ant shell yet?
Date Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:11:28 GMT
Yes, that´s what wished in Bug 17659. But its rejected, sorry -
marked as "WONTFIX" = "The problem described is a bug which will never be
fixed.".

So good luck on writing and let us know ;-)
Maybe Leos Literak (Reporter of that bug) will help you.


Jan Matèrne

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: webhiker [mailto:webhiker@tiscali.fr]
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 13. März 2003 11:46
An: Ant Users List
Betreff: Re: AW: Anyone written an Ant shell yet?

More along the lines of your second option.
But not quite...

During development (die-hard Xemacs) I  always iterate around
"ant clean"
"ant compile"
"ant jar"

etc. to call my targets as needed.

In a shell mode, I would just need to type
%ant shell>clean
%ant shell>compile
%ant shell>jar

with the MAIN benefit of :
1)not having to wait 3 days for a Jvm to start each time
2)A homogenous env instead of arsing about with Cygwin, cmd.exe, Unix 
shells etc.
3)It could easily extend and embrace cvs commands, Windows/Unix style 
directory navigation etc.


WH
Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
> I don´t know what you understand here on "shell".
> 
> If you want to write a IDE for buildscripts have a look on Eclipse PlugIn
> "Planty"
> before (http://www.gebit.de/download/planty/about.html). 
> 
> If you want to have a command line interface for calling targets
> 	ANT> init target1
> 	ANT> [target1] output
> 	ANT> -Dprop=value
> 	ANT> calltarget2
> then let other people know it:
> 	http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14159
> 	http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17659
> 
> 
> Jan Matèrne
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: webhiker [mailto:webhiker@tiscali.fr]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 13. März 2003 10:02
> An: Ant Users List
> Betreff: Anyone written an Ant shell yet?
> 
> Just wondering if anyone's attempted to write an Ant shell.
> Developing build files using Ant is quite nice, but if we could get a 
> shell together, it would provide a cross-platform shell environment as 
> well, saving switching between Unix, Cygwin, command etc, plus should 
> see much better start-up time for executing Ant tasks, since  they would 
> be run in the same JVM.
> 
> Anyone done this already, or is there a good reason why it's a bad idea?
> 
> WH
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message