ant-user mailing list archives

Kyle Adams wrote:
> 
> Forgot to mention that - I tried and found that the line was chopped
> off in the generic jar.  So does that mean the culprit is <ejbjar>?  I'm
> using Ant 1.5.1, can't verify if the behavior still occurs in the latest
> builds.

Can you send me an example (or raise a bug and attach it). I'll investigate. 
The <ejbjar> manifest handling is done with the JDK's Jar/Manifest classes

Conor