Return-Path: 
 <ant-user-return-27383-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 48647 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 17:19:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 17:19:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 11647 invoked by uid 97); 5 Dec 2002 17:20:09 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11586 invoked by uid 97); 5 Dec 2002 17:20:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-user-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Users List" <ant-user.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11569 invoked by uid 98); 5 Dec 2002 17:20:07 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002)
Message-ID: <D44A54C298394F4E967EC8538B1E00F1D2BA39@lgchexch002.lgc.com>
From: Dominique Devienne <DDevienne@lgc.com>
To: "'Ant Users List'" <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: For-loop in Ant
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:18:57 -0600 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

But you're still not saying what you're doing ;-) So there's no telling
if/how it was possible to do it in a different possibly 'better' fashion
than using <foreach>/<parallel>. Good luck whatever you're doing ;-) --DD

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Dettori [mailto:markus.dettori@wuerth-phoenix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: For-loop in Ant

> Note to dismiss the value of ant-contrib's <foreach>, but many times there
> was an acceptable pure Ant way to do the same thing without <foreach>,
which
> has its share of quirks. Granted, sometimes there is no Ant way, but like
I
> said, many times there was. Care to elaborate what you're doing? Just in
> case ;-) --DD
>

So, just tell me more ;-) I'm a impassionate reader :)
The problem is not the <foreach>, it is the parallel execution of
one target with different, changing properties, provided by
<foreachs> param list. The next problem is, that <foreach>
uses <antcall> and for a lot of targets (approx. there will be 1000) to
call,
I will get a "few" problems with ant (OoM).

ci sentiamo,
Markus

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>