ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wannheden, Knut" <>
Subject RE: cruisecontrol vs anthill
Date Mon, 14 Oct 2002 06:23:29 GMT

> We use CruiseControl on my work project and its working well, 
> although 
> it is mildly painful to set up and get running.  I expect more from 
> CruiseControl though, given its Martin Fowler's company 
> people that are 
> developing it (are you listening Thoughtworks?! :) - having to tweak 
> configuration *inside* a WAR file is just not cool - make a better 
> interface, leverage the slickness of Anthill in this respect (sorry, 
> while I had a soap box I thought I'd use it :).

Are you using the newest version (2.0, released 25. September 2002) of
CruiseControl?  Just wondering since many of the things mentioned in your
chart seem to have changed with the new version, but I haven't had time to
try it.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message