Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 28346 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 12:05:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 12:05:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 3819 invoked by uid 97); 11 Sep 2002 12:06:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3755 invoked by uid 97); 11 Sep 2002 12:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3724 invoked by uid 98); 11 Sep 2002 12:06:00 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Originating-IP: [62.58.28.155] From: "A Competitor" To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Bcc: Subject: Re: [TEST] JTest 4.4 and Ant Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:04:02 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2002 12:04:03.0049 (UTC) FILETIME=[51FA7590:01C2598B] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dear Stefan, >From: Stefan Bodewig >Is JTest a competitor to Ant? Does it build projects? > > > JTest reports an incredible amount of runtime errors in Ant No, JTest is a Quality Assurance tool that performs static- and dynamic analysis on Java projects. >would be nice to see the detailed report, so we could evaluate them. >If possible, open a bug report at bugzilla and attach it, so we can >wade through it and fix the things that may be real problems. > > > [ 165 ] java.lang.NullPointerException > Here is a problem: I cannot attach the files I want to send because the apache mailserver rejects anything larger than 400Kb. Therefor I will send a gzipped tar file with examples to your personal apache mailaccount ! Maybe you can put some of it on the forum. >would JTest see that the javadocs say something like "must not be >null" for method arguments? > Yes, if you choose to use Parasoft's DbC tool and add appropriate javadoc statements. But then you need to commit to DbC which changes your code when compiling the sources (adds checks based on DbC javadoc) Greetings _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: