Return-Path: 
 <ant-user-return-23495-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 18071 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2002 14:07:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2002 14:07:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 146 invoked by uid 97); 2 Aug 2002 14:08:02 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 130 invoked by uid 97); 2 Aug 2002 14:08:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-user-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Users List" <ant-user.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 115 invoked by uid 98); 2 Aug 2002 14:08:01 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002)
Message-ID: <2DAFF28F562AD4119B0E00508B5F049F01D4246A@AMSEXCH01>
From: Tibor  Strausz <Tibor.Strausz@tridion.com>
To: Ant Users List <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: moving slowly
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:08:55 +0200 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

yea why?????

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:DDevienne@lgc.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: 'Ant Users List'
> Subject: RE: moving slowly
> 
> 
> But this applies only if there is an existing directory 
> corresponding to the
> target. If no such directory exists, then it might indeed be 
> much faster to
> rename the directory, and remove the excluded files.
> 
> Can I ask why the <rename> task was deprecated? It seems it's 
> a better fit
> than the error-prone <move todir=''><fileset dir=''
> defaultexcludes'='false'/></move>? Involving <move> & 
> filesets to rename one
> directory or file seems overkill to me. Sure *nix only a mv 
> command, but it
> doesn't have the notion of fileset, and neither does it exclude stuff
> automatically. I'd like to know the rationals against <rename>. --DD
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org] 
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 1:54 AM
> To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: moving slowly
> 
> > If your <move> is slow, it's because <move> detected some files
> > shouldn't be moved, and thus cannot simply rename the directory
> > (although I guess it could, and delete the ones that shouldn't be
> > moved...).
> 
> No, the files that are not supposed to be moved could already be
> present in the target directory.  Neither overwriting the existing
> files nor deleting them would be very nice.  8-)
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>