ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <>
Subject Re: polymorphic data types as nested elements
Date Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:29:48 GMT
By using addXXX or addConfiguredXXX you're asking Ant to create the 
object for you, so it must be creatable with a no-arg constructor. An 
abstract class is not - so you will get some kind of nasty error.

You need to implement the createXXX method so that you create some 
concrete object to return back, but your createXXX method can be 
declared to return the abstract base class if you desire (but remember 
that introspection is being used, so it *will* find 
setters/creators/adders on the actual object returned even if they are 
not declared on the abstract base class).


Shackelford, John-Mason wrote:
> Greetings all,
> Having combed through Hatcher & Loughran's chapter on writing custom tasks
> (very good BTW),
> I am still a bit perplexed as to how ant resolves addXXX calls against
> nested tags. What is not clear to me is how the XXX portion is used in
> conjunction with the argument type.
> I have a task which is responsible for processing commands. I define an
> abstract class which extends DataType and then subclass it for various
> commands: Get, GenericCommand, etc. The addXXX method on my command
> processing task can then take an AbstractCommand object to work its magic. 
> If I write the addXXX signature as: addAbstractCommand(AbstractCommand c),
> will the nested command objects be properly populated even if they contain
> getters and setters which are not overriden from AbstractCommand? Do I need
> to add multiple addXXX signatures: AddGet(AbstractCommand c),
> AddGenericCommand(AbstractCommand c). (This seems completely backwards). In
> short, what is the cash value of the XXX portion of addXXX if we can
> determine type info from the argument?
> Probably I am missing something basic. Forgive me.
> John-Mason Shackelford
> Software Developer
> NCS Pearson - Measurement Services
> 2510 North Dodge St.
> Iowa City, IA 52245
> 319-354-9200x6214
> **************************************************************************** 
> This email may contain confidential material. 
> If you were not an intended recipient, 
> Please notify the sender and delete all copies. 
> We may monitor email to and from our network. 
> ****************************************************************************
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message