Return-Path: 
 <ant-user-return-22952-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 60128 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2002 23:02:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2002 23:02:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 5395 invoked by uid 97); 18 Jul 2002 23:02:40 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5367 invoked by uid 97); 18 Jul 2002 23:02:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-user-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Users List" <ant-user.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5355 invoked by uid 98); 18 Jul 2002 23:02:38 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002)
Message-ID: <D44A54C298394F4E967EC8538B1E00F10C0FAE@lgchexch002.lgc.com>
From: Dominique Devienne <DDevienne@lgc.com>
To: "'Ant Users List'" <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: fail-safe O/S-dependent operations idiom?
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:02:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Humm, OK. I see. At one point I wondered (aloud) whether one should allow a
<propertyset> to refer to an undefined property, and I was leaning on the
side of not allowing it. <condition> sets properties, and to respect
immutability, the property it sets shouldn't exist, right? Thus is wouldn't
work!?!?!? --DD

-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Holt [mailto:holtdl@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 5:56 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: fail-safe O/S-dependent operations idiom?

--- Dominique Devienne <DDevienne@lgc.com> wrote:
> And Diane, I'm not sure I follow the link between <condition> and
> <propertyset>?

I was just thinking it'd be nice to be able to set more than one property
in a single <condition>, so maybe <condition> could be enhanced to allow
for a nested <propertyset> (but maybe it's not the right thing to use for
that -- dunno, just thinking out loud :)

Diane

=====
(holtdl@yahoo.com)



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>