Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98595 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 22:50:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 22:50:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 17633 invoked by uid 97); 23 Apr 2002 22:50:05 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17623 invoked by uid 97); 23 Apr 2002 22:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 2097 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 22:31:40 -0000 X-Mailer: 21.5 (beta4) "bamboo" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 10 Q); VM 7.03 under 21.5 (beta4) "bamboo" XEmacs Lucid From: "Philip Aston" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15557.34613.408664.217670@bea.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:09:25 +0100 To: "Erik Hatcher" Cc: "Ant Users List" Subject: Re: pingURL: A better way to start and stop application servers? In-Reply-To: <05b101c1dc36$9dd65a60$6501a8c0@darden.virginia.edu> References: <05b101c1dc36$9dd65a60$6501a8c0@darden.virginia.edu> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [old thread, I've been busy] Erik Hatcher writes: > Have a look at the task that exists in Ant's CVS and > see if your pingURL has any synergy with that framework. If so, let > us know! Hmmm.. no, serverdeploy simply does a hot deployment, my task is about starting WLS. Steve Loughran writes: > You can use to probe a url with controlled sleep time and > timeout interval, sets a property on success, etc. > > All pingurl does is add a container wrapper, but it only allows url 2XX > conditions to be evaluated (presumably); can probe any port for > being openable, plus all the other conditions that are possible Yep, waitfor is more generic and wins. Roll on 1.5 :-) Thanks chaps, - Phil -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: