Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23981 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2001 02:28:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23963 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2001 02:28:30 -0000 Message-ID: <01c201c14c8a$d53fca90$af0101cf@vkoppika> From: "Shyam Koppikar" To: References: <3D0E38416579D411803C00D0B7AF6B210D56E9CE@gsny47e.ny.fw.gs.com> <3BB9C201.F19B6890@somanetworks.com> Subject: Re: Delete task Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 21:12:50 -0700 Organization: Descon Consultants MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn McAllister" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:32 AM Subject: Re: Delete task > "Frazier, Scott" wrote: > > > Hi, > > Does ant 1.4 support the notion of deleting a symbolic link as > > opposed to the file/directory the symlink points to? I know I can use the > > exec task, but I'd rather avoid that if possible. > > Not at the moment, no. There have been a number of discussions about using > cannonical filename and whatnot to distinguish between symlinks and the actual > files, but I don't recall what came of them. There was an issue that wasn't > resovled with that algorithm if I remember correctly. > > Glenn McAllister > SOMA Networks, Inc. > >