Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 21394 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2001 01:37:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 21375 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2001 01:37:04 -0000 Message-ID: <016a01c14af1$55f04cf0$700101cf@vkoppika> From: "Shyam Koppikar" To: , References: <3BB8573A.6020106@cortexebusiness.com.au> Subject: Re: Wrong sig for Ant 1.4? Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 20:21:32 -0700 Organization: Descon Consultants MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message ----- From: "Conor MacNeill" To: ; Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:44 AM Subject: Re: Wrong sig for Ant 1.4? > Timothy Shadel wrote: > > > Please let me know when you've found a solution as well. > > > > - Tim > > > > > >>>>Chris 09/28/01 10:02AM >>> > >>>> > > Timothy, > > > > You got the same problem I got. Even better, you were using the GUI and PGP > > 7.0.2, and I was using the command line and PGP 6.5.8. > > > > Conor, I'm a little pressed for time right now to try and install GPG and > > check it out, but the sig should really work on both, shouldn't it? If you > > want to try and get it working on PGP as well, I'd be happy to be a guinea > > pig. If you want, send to my personal email at chris@ooc2000.com - I check > > that more than the any list. > > > > - Chris > > OK, this is what I have found. I can verify the signature using gpg both > on Win32 and Linux. Conversely, PGP always indicates the signature is > bad. I tried many versions of the GUI version on Win32 and the command > line version on the jakarta.apache.org server. I'm not sure why this is. > > Anyway I have just posted a new 1.4.1 Beta release here > http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-ant/release/v1.4.1b1/ > > I generated this on Linux rather than Win32. I have still used gpg to > sign the files but pgp on jakarta.apache.org seems a lot happier with > these. Can you check those files out and let me know. > > Thanks > Conor > > >