ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shyam Koppikar" <vkopp...@tds.net>
Subject Re: Wrong sig for Ant 1.4?
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2001 03:21:32 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Conor MacNeill" <conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>
To: <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>; <chris@ooc2000.com>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:44 AM
Subject: Re: Wrong sig for Ant 1.4?


> Timothy Shadel wrote:
>
> > Please let me know when you've found a solution as well.
> >
> > - Tim
> >
> >
> >>>>Chris <chris@ooc2000.com> 09/28/01 10:02AM >>>
> >>>>
> > Timothy,
> >
> > You got the same problem I got. Even better, you were using the GUI and
PGP
> > 7.0.2, and I was using the command line and PGP 6.5.8.
> >
> > Conor, I'm a little pressed for time right now to try and install GPG
and
> > check it out, but the sig should really work on both, shouldn't it? If
you
> > want to try and get it working on PGP as well, I'd be happy to be a
guinea
> > pig. If you want, send to my personal email at chris@ooc2000.com - I
check
> > that more than the any list.
> >
> > - Chris
>
> OK, this is what I have found. I can verify the signature using gpg both
> on Win32 and Linux. Conversely, PGP always indicates the signature is
> bad. I tried many versions of the GUI version on Win32 and the command
> line version on the jakarta.apache.org server. I'm not sure why this is.
>
> Anyway I have just posted a new 1.4.1 Beta release here
> http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-ant/release/v1.4.1b1/
>
> I generated this on Linux rather than Win32. I have still used gpg to
> sign the files but pgp on jakarta.apache.org seems a lot happier with
> these. Can you check those files out and let me know.
>
> Thanks
> Conor
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message