Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 85879 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2001 13:12:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 85858 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2001 13:12:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3BA745EB.9C1AB53E@prodigy.net> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:02:35 -0400 From: Scott Russell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: question about javac dependencies!!! References: <20010917170103.46270.qmail@web11607.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Not exactly, I mean the import statements in your java source files. As I understand it, the compiler will check the dependencies for a given java source program, IF they are obtained (re: imported) via fully qualified statements and will ignore any files obtained via a wild carded imports. Scott "Edgar S�nchez" wrote: > > Hi Scott > > I'm not using import at all.. does the javac ant > task have and import task? > > with javac, i'm only using: > > destdir="${PATH_DESTEJBReg}"/> > > I checked the documentation for the import task in > javac, but it doesn't appear to be inclued with javac. > > Thanks Scott > > Edgar > > --- Scott Russell wrote: > > Edgar, > > > > Are you doing imports that end in an asterisk for > > your own, dependent files? If so, try making them > > explicit imports for just those components you're > > using. > > > > for example: > > instead of... > > import ../Arquitecture/util/* > > try... > > import ../Arquitecture/util/Fu > > import ../Arquitecture/util/Bar > > (etc.) > > > > Hope this helps... > > > > Scott > > > > > > "Edgar S�nchez" wrote: > > > > > > Hi Frank thanks for the reply... > > > > > > There is a part when you talk about that javac > > > looks for .java files to compile and then if there > > is > > > no file compiled or if not updated, javac do the > > > job.... Well in my case, using the javac ant tag > > > doesn't compile the java files need to proceed > > with > > > the rest of the project compilation. > > > > > > All this jumps up to me, coz when I'm in the DOS > > > command session window, I do the javac in an > > specific > > > directory, and the javac runs fine, but when I try > > to > > > use the same procedure just using javac Ant, it > > come > > > out a several errors saying that the package is > > not > > > builded. > > > > > > Thats why I'm at looking for the truth, too :-) > > > > > > Thanks > > > Edgar > > > > > > ===== > > > > > > > >