ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "T Master" <>
Subject documentation comment
Date Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:00:24 GMT

Ant belongs to the Jakarta project.  As does Log4J.

Having used both, it is clear that just because something belongs to the
Jakarta project, does not make it an excellent piece of architecture or be
excellently documented (or half way there).

I won't say anymore for flame risk, but if you compare the two, Ant is
brilliant, super, a delight to use.  Its Javadocs are comprehensible, as are
its examples.

Yes Log4J is a nice utility, but its documentation for examples, and
javadocs are incomplete by a fair amount.
My only whine.

T Master

View raw message