ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shyam Koppikar" <vkopp...@tds.net>
Subject Re: Javascript errors
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2001 03:30:03 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Diane Holt" <holtdl@yahoo.com>
To: <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Javascript errors


> --- Robert Seeger <rseeger@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:
> > To tell the truth, I don't know that I will use the "project name"
> > anywhere else. I think this part boils down to a matter of style.
> > I like to try to do things the way it first looks like they should be
> > done, if possible.
>
> But I don't think there is a "should be" in this case -- I've never heard
> of any standard anyway. If you think of the build as a single project,
> with the build-files in the subdirs representing pieces of that project,
> then I don't think having a single name for the project would constitute a
> "shouldn't be done". And you wouldn't have to scrap what you already have
> and start designing it all over again, which should help with your time
> constraint. If <script> gets changed to accomodate using "project" instead
> of the actual name, you'd only need to change the named references in the
> script text to accommodate the change.
>
> Diane
>
> =====
> (holtdl@yahoo.com)
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
> http://phone.yahoo.com


Mime
View raw message