ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "T Master" <tmas...@iknowledgeinc.com>
Subject Re: multiple builds
Date Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:02:46 GMT
I like the lousely couple and highly coupled build projects comments.

I've tried both.  I decide to have sub-projects in their own buidl file
incase of extra issues need to be coded.
However, I am stilldithering between then two, and could just have one
build.xml that defines patternsets for each of the sub-project build files,
and pass it to my generic common.xml targets as parameters.  Easier to
maintain if things are still in a state of flux e.g. taskdef defining,
classpaths changing.

I'll do it for fun!   Just need to copy patternsets out of each file into a
build.xml file.  then edit my common.xml to accept parameters.  Code re-use
rules!
I wonder which would be preferred?


T Master

----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn McAllister" <glenn@somanetworks.com>
To: <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: multiple builds


> Richard Emberson wrote:
>
> > Actually there ought to be an Ant best practices page somewhere
>
> There is, more or less:
>
>
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/~checkout~/jakarta-ant/docs/ant_in_anger.html?
rev=1.3.2.1
>
> (Sorry if line wraps break the link...)
>
> Glenn McAllister
> SOMA Networks, Inc.
>


Mime
View raw message