Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19651 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2001 09:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19380 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2001 09:01:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Peter Donald To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: FTP Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:23:38 +1000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <001b01c109df$f88ef540$a759a8c0@wipro.com> <3B4C0C11.CFB70D02@bsis.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3B4C0C11.CFB70D02@bsis.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071118233800.00988@helm.realityforge.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:19, dave young wrote: > This is very petty, but i think it'd be "swell" if the ftp task could be > requested to display the hashes that get displayed via a regular ftp > program. when ftp'ing largish files over questionable links, it can > sometimes be very helpful to determine whether to keep a download going > or to kill it and start over. Sounds like you are volunteering ? ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*