Sorry to Lazarus this thread...
Nope, if you give javadocs a jar, it'll barf.
A package name, as the javadoc task expects, is well the package name
(org.apache.struts.myPackage)
Follow this trail fo more information on pacakges.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/interpack/packages.html
If you look at any jars you have, at a minimum, they'll have the
compiled bytecode. Whether they have source code, the javadoc stuff,
etc, is solely up to the person generating the jar. To see what's in a
jar, type "jar tvf myJar.jar" and that will show you what's in it. As
you are on a windows platform, you may also use WinZip to view the
inside of a jar. More info on jars.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jar/index.html
-----Original Message-----
From: pinarbici [mailto:pinarbici@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 5:08 PM
To: ant-user
Cc: pinarbici
Subject: RE: javadoc ....
Since "org.apache.struts.form" is not a standard package , aren't I
suppose
to put my source file in a jar and then reference it in "packagenames"
attribute ???
I am a little confused now :)
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
|