ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jamie Lawrence <jamie.lawre...@broadcom.ie>
Subject RE: JavaDoc and patternsets
Date Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:19:33 GMT
Yeah, I'm kinda happy not to be doing that for javac, and didn't really want
to start for javadoc.  It does seem like a logical thing to want to do...
perhaps it's time to peer closer into the ANT source code and see if it
would be possible.  

Jamie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Crosbie [mailto:jeremy@go2.com]
> Sent: 27 June 2001 19:12
> To: 'ant-user@jakarta.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: JavaDoc and patternsets
> 
> 
> Looking at the documentation I don't see how a patternset can 
> be used with
> the javadoc task.
> 
> One thing you can do rather than use a patternset is to copy only the
> sources you wish to compile into a directory separate from 
> your controlled
> source. You can then point the Javadoc task to that 
> directory, the result
> being hopefully what you are asking for. This results in only 
> having to use
> a patterset once rather than twice (once for javac, another 
> for javadoc).
> 
> hth
> 
> Jeremy Michael Crosbie
> Senior Software Engineer
> go2online.com
> go2Address: US.CA.IRV.GO2
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jamie Lawrence [mailto:jamie.lawrence@broadcom.ie]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:29 AM
> > To: 'ant-user@jakarta.apache.org'
> > Subject: JavaDoc and patternsets
> > 
> > 
> > Is it possible to use the same patternset I define for javac 
> > in the javadoc
> > task?  Basically I want to produce documentation only for the 
> > classes that
> > were actually compiled.
> > 
> > Many thanks,
> > 
> > 	Jamie
> >  
> > 
> > 
> 


Mime
View raw message