ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Larry V. Streepy, Jr." <>
Subject Re: Ant documentation (was: Re: javax.sql.DataSource(Thanks!!))
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2001 14:50:22 GMT
Have to agree with Diane here.  Although the Ant documentation is terse,
it provides the needed reference information.

How a JVM plays with your classpath or how javadoc works is not
something the Ant documentation should be expected to teach you.

And Ant is open source, so if you're unclear on something - Use the
source Luke!

Diane Holt wrote:
> --- Suu Quan <> wrote:
> > Same here (not javadoc, but other tasks). It says a lot about the
> > quality of the documentation.
> > If I'm still not clear: I give a Failing grade for documentation.
> I completely disagree -- but maybe I'm too familiar with it at this point
> to be objective about it. Where, specifically, do you think it fails?
> (Keeping in mind that it's not intended to teach people Java, XML, or
> anything other than how to use Ant.)
> Diane
> =====
> (
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
> a year!

Larry V. Streepy, Jr.
Chief Technical Officer and VP of Engineering

Health Language, Inc.  -- "We speak the language of healthcare"
A subsidiary of CyberPlus Corp.

970/626-5028 (office) 
970/626-4425 (fax)    

View raw message