ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Suu Quan" <sq...@wwc.com>
Subject Re: Ant documentation (was: Re: javax.sql.DataSource(Thanks!!))
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2001 16:12:59 GMT
> > --- Suu Quan <squan@wwc.com> wrote:
> > > Same here (not javadoc, but other tasks). It says a lot about the
> > > quality of the documentation.
> > > If I'm still not clear: I give a Failing grade for documentation.
> >
> > I completely disagree -- but maybe I'm too familiar with it at this
point
> > to be objective about it. Where, specifically, do you think it fails?
> > (Keeping in mind that it's not intended to teach people Java, XML, or
> > anything other than how to use Ant.)

Should call it a reference manual (and a bad one at it), not a user manual.
Where does it fail? I know java,xml,make .... you name it, unless I missed
other prerequisites, and I can't make good use of it.
Other people already filled other details.


Mime
View raw message