Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 86486 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2001 08:02:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 86360 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 08:02:40 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010531180836.0093cb80@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 18:08:36 +1000 To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: Re: [Ant-user] Please prepend a tag to the subject Cc: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 09:49 AM 5/31/01 +0200, Are.Bjolseth@sas.no wrote: >To moderator/owner > >Please prepend the tag [Ant-user] to the subject in each email sent from the >forum. A forum identifer tag makes it much easier to mange and cope with >email from busy forums. This violates a number of RFCs and is generally considered practice and thus it is recomended that you instead use the Reply-To: field to filter traffic. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*