Return-Path: 
 <ant-user-return-7385-apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 59349 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2001 09:54:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-user-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 59332 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 09:54:37 -0000
Message-ID: <006201c0d3b7$9264a840$92020c3f@cognetnt>
From: "Conor MacNeill" <conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>
To: <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
References: <0373D1CCF679D411A80300B0D03DE06FCE7FD6@CHALFONT>
Subject: Re: Optional jar snapshot
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 19:44:55 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

From: "Andrew Thompson" <andrewt@quidnunc.com>
To: <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Optional jar snapshot


> >From: Conor MacNeill
> >I have built a recent snapshot of the optional jar. This is a more
>
> Hi Conor,
>
> I believe from your earlier mail that this changes the <weblogic> task to
> use Weblogic 6's new ejb2.0 compiler/persistance layer rather than the
> wl5.1/ejb1.1 ejb compiler?

No, it uses the DTD to pick the right compiler. It can still be used for
EJB1.1 beans either under WL5.1 or WL6

>
> We're using the 5.1 persistance layer with wl6.0, mostly because we don't
> trust new code for something so major until its had at least a couple of
> service packs, and we know the 5.1 stuff works.

That is cool.

>
> So... for us this would be a big problem with ant 1.4, if we were forced
to
> use the new ejbc (or can it handle 5.1 and 6.0 stuff?). Perhaps adding a
> target="" attribute to the weblogic element would allow selection of the
> compiler to use in an elegant fashion. Or is this a non-issue?

It is a non-issue, but you can also supply the compiler class if you like
so that if there is a future change in WLS, you can override the Ant task's
defaults.

Conor