Return-Path: 
 <ant-user-return-6796-apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8717 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2001 18:01:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ant-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ant-user-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8632 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2001 18:01:34 -0000
Message-ID: <3D15BF68D0C6D41193A6009027E344BF239C0B@EXBOSTON>
From: Pinar Bicioglu <p.bicioglu@CustomerDialogue.com>
To: "'ant-user@jakarta.apache.org'" <ant-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: pulling out the code from SourceSafe
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:56:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1252"
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

yes! definetely this is what happens...I've tried so many times and
everytime I got the same results!

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Cummings [mailto:kevin.cummings@mongoosetech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:00 PM
To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: pulling out the code from SourceSafe


You mean if you try to run the target twice in a row it tells you that it 
doesn't exist?? That's really strange!! Are you sure you typed it 
correctly? I'm at a loss here if you are just typing the same command twice 
and it works once and then not the next time.. Try it again and see if you 
get the same results.

At 01:42 PM 4/17/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Kevin and you were both right! I have a target called asi but it depends 
>on "asi-compile" which is the executable part!
>
>I have one more and hopefully last question! so "ant getcode" is working 
>now. But right after writing "ant getcode", if I try to execute it again 
>by writing the same command ("ant getcode"), it says "Target `getcode' 
>does not exist in this project."
>Is it what it is suppose to say? I mean it is logical to get the code once 
>instead of getting it everytime when i run build.xml
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peterson, Lance [mailto:lpeterson@verticore.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:32 PM
>To: 'ant-user@jakarta.apache.org'
>Subject: RE: pulling out the code from SourceSafe
>
>Pinar, this is what you put in your original post about the getcode target 
>failing...
>
><target name="getcode">
>         <echo message="getting latest code from the Source Safe..."/>
>  <vssget vsspath="/assetplanner/Engineering/dev/java"
>          login="pbicioglu, pinar"
>   writable="true"
>   localpath="D:/sandbox/Engineering/dev/java"
>   recursive="true"
>   ssdir="D:\ProgramFiles\MicrosoftVisualStudio\VSS\win32" />
>   </target>
>
> From this it looks like the value for ssdir doesn't have any 
> spaces.  Please verify that your build.xml has the correct path for 
> SS.EXE.  Please note that by default SourceSafe 6.0 installs to \Program 
> Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\Common\VSS\Win32 (note the "Common").
>Regarding your getcode-compile issue, the syntax for running Ant is...
>
>ant [options] [target [target2 [target3] ...]]
>
>I've never heard of being able to specify "target-compile" instead of 
>"target".  If I have the following build.xml file...
><?xml version="1.0"?>
><project name="testing">
>   <target name="test1">
>     <echo message="Test #1"/>
>   </target>
>   <target name="test2">
>     <echo message="Test #2"/>
>   </target>
></project>
>
>...and I want to run both tests, I'd execute the following:
>
>ant test1 test2
>
>This tells ant to execute the targets named "test1" and "test2".  When I 
>try to execute "ant test1-compile test2-compile" ant tells me 
>"test1-compile" doesn't exist, which is correct.  Are you sure you don't 
>have a target named "asi-compile" instead of "asi"?
>Best regards,
>Lance Peterson