Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88118 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 17:44:50 -0000 Received: from gateway1.lawson.com (206.145.14.2) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 17:44:50 -0000 Received: from gateway1.lawson.com (root@localhost) by gateway1.lawson.com with ESMTP id LAA06004 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:44:58 -0600 (CST) From: David.Bailey@lawson.com Received: from smtp.lawson.com (smtp.lawson.com [10.0.0.100]) by gateway1.lawson.com with SMTP id LAA05997 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:44:58 -0600 (CST) Received: by smtp.lawson.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 062569B3.0061B3E4 ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:47:10 -0600 X-Lotus-FromDomain: LAWSON To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Message-ID: <062569B3.00618528.00@smtp.lawson.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:44:31 -0600 Subject: Minimum configuration requirements for ant Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Howdy. We have a rather large Java initiative under way here, and have developed a directory structure which we feel works best for us as far as compiling, packaging, jarring, etc. One of the reasons we have decided to look at ant is because it is open source and therefore it is very easy to tailor it to our needs. However, since we do intend to integrate ant into our code development, we want it to fit in with the directory structure we've already established. I am therefore faced with the task of attempting to take the directory structure which falls out of the jakarta-ant-src.zip file and modifying it to fit into our scheme. After a little bit of playing around, it appears that I can get away with putting the wrapper scripts from ant/bin into some appropriate bin directory on our $PATH, compiling the ant source via javac, and moving the class files to an appropriate location on our $CLASSPATH. I've tried this sort of install and tried running some toy tests, and this appears to work. Am I overlooking some configuration necessity which will cause problems down the line? Thanks, --dave