ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Duncan Davidson <dun...@x180.net>
Subject Re: <javadoc> disappointmenet
Date Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:43:16 GMT
On 12/8/00 7:55 AM, "Robert M. Zigweid" <tigran@internation.co.uk> wrote:

> My problem is that Ant appears to call the javadoc as a command, rather
> than utilizing the javadoc api.  Using the API should be able to allow
> filesets, as are used by javac and possibly make the tag more
> functional.  Are there any plans for this in the future?  Am I off my
> rocker?

Keep in mind that the more sophisticated Javadoc didn't show up till 1.2 --
and currently Ant 1.x supports JDk 1.x. When moving to 1.2, there may be an
opportunity to better use the internal apis.. I haven't yet investigated
this, though I probably will be shortly.

-- 
James Duncan Davidson                                        duncan@x180.net
                                                                  !try; do()


Mime
View raw message