Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 21:54:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gottfried Szing <goofy@yasd.dhs.org>
To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org, alex@trapezo.com
Subject: RE: archive - they just had a message of the ant version 2
In-Reply-To: <005501c03dee$aeddb4d0$5f64a8c0@trapezo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010242153580.10016-100000@gottfried.yasd.dhs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Alex Genadinik wrote:

> release, am i mistaking?

i think version 1.2 is meant - seems to be much better and
powerful than version 1.1. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gottfried Szing [mailto:goofy@yasd.dhs.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 11:51 AM
> To: ant-user@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> Subject: Re: archive
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Diane Holt wrote:
> 
> > There's a searchable archive at:
> >   <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&r=1&w=2>
> > 
> > There's also a non-searchable archive at:
> >   <http://archive.covalent.net/>
> > 
> > What there isn't, is a link to these on the Ant home-page,
> > for some inexplicable reason.
> 
> i think thats a very big mistake because the archive is very
> useful and answered many questions i have. but of course not all. 
> 
> one question left: when is the next stable release planned? i
> work for a company and we need a stable version. the latest
> release (1.1) doesnt provide all features we need. and the CVS
> version is not really very useful for a big project because i
> dont know what day the most stable version was. 
> 
> are any suggestion for a stable development version?
> 
> 

-- 
cu, goofy

To predict the future, you must know the past. -Pat Artis
    --> http://yasd.dhs.org/ ICQ: 34550587