Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 60166 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2000 03:35:05 -0000 Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (64.6.192.82) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2000 03:35:05 -0000 Received: from succubussi ([64.6.208.156]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:33:51 -0700 Message-ID: <000d01c02e7d$90ec9f70$364211ac@succubussi> Reply-To: "Scott M Stark" From: "Scott M Stark" To: References: <39BD0758.5F2D9B3B@netbeans.com> Subject: Dynamic binding of properties Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:37:20 -0700 Organization: DisplayScape.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I tried to write an ant script that would go through an object serialization compatibility testing suite. It is using BSF/JavaScript to try to simplify the writing of a common set of steps shown below as the runV target. The script below does not work because properties are bound as the xml document is parsed. Now I have looked at how properties are handled by Ant and at first glance it does not seem that it would be all that difficult to introduce dynamic properties, but it would require a complete change in how properties and attributes are represented. Is this something that could show up on a future todo list or are there ramifications that would make this unlikely? ...