Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57225 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2009 09:54:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2009 09:54:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 18961 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2009 09:54:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-notifications-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 18943 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2009 09:54:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ant.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 18930 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2009 09:54:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:54:21 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:54:20 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3013234C4A7 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:53:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1319412560.1233222839928.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:53:59 -0800 (PST) From: "Xavier Hanin (JIRA)" To: notifications@ant.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (IVY-1022) Forced resolver behavior is inappropriate for ivy:install In-Reply-To: <1446745887.1233170579890.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xavier Hanin updated IVY-1022: ------------------------------ Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) I don't classify this as a bug, because if you use a forced resolver in your source resolver chain, it's not that much a bug what happen. It's more a settings problem IMHO. But having an easy way to prevent forced resolvers from being forced during install could be an interesting improvement. > Forced resolver behavior is inappropriate for ivy:install > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IVY-1022 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1022 > Project: Ivy > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Ant > Affects Versions: 2.0 > Reporter: Carlton Brown > > I tried to install a certain revision of a module from a chained resolver to an fs resolver, and observed that Ivy installed a revision other than what I specified. After investigation I noticed that the chain contained a forced fs resolver. I removed the forced resolver from the chain, replacing it with an equivalent un-forced fs resolver. The install worked correctly after that. > I think that ivy:install should not be doing any dynamic version resolution at all. It should in every case use the literal module identifiers that are passed to it. This being the case, install should ignore a force attribute wherever it is encountered. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.