ant-ivy-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roger <roger.parkinso...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2 Questions for ivyIDE
Date Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:13:59 GMT
I avoid using latest.integration because it always has to go back to the 
repo to check for a later version rather than use the cache.
It does mean you have to release a new version of your 3rd tier 
dependencies to get a change in your first tier picked up but I see that 
as a good thing.

R
On 21/03/12 07:03, David Sills wrote:
> I see that the Ivy way is better once you are using Ivy, but it's
> frustrating when I can't figure out how to publish sources in the first
> place....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Not Zippy [mailto:notzippy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:01 PM
> To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 2 Questions for ivyIDE
>
> Eclipse may be a bit more flexible, but it is better to encapsulate it
> the way ivy does.
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, David Sills
> <DSills@datasourceinc.com>wrote:
>
>> Oh, Alan, and what I meant is that on the regular Eclipse project
>> classpath one is allowed to supply source code locations along with a
>> JAR file added to the classpath. This can be another JAR or a
> directory.
>> I understand now that Ivy processes this differently. Pity, since the
>> Eclipse methodology is far more flexible.
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message