Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C64E76A5 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7260 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2011 17:25:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 7166 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2011 17:25:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ivy-user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 7158 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2011 17:25:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:25:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sprior@geekster.com designates 99.153.139.110 as permitted sender) Received: from [99.153.139.110] (HELO geekster.com) (99.153.139.110) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:25:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.6] (stevepad [192.168.0.6]) by geekster.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id p6QGPOK9001273 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:25:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2EF87D.8010205@geekster.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:25:17 -0400 From: Steve Prior User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: container supplied jars excluded in ivy References: <4E2C3644.8030109@geekster.com> <5255155122564238197@unknownmsgid> <4E2C684B.3010105@geekster.com> ,<4E2E15CD.6070906@geekster.com> <4E2E335B.6060500@geekster.com> <4E2EC1BD.4010401@masergy.com> In-Reply-To: <4E2EC1BD.4010401@masergy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I can see how, given your situation, using excludes is a more general solution. > I guess I'm fortunate not to be in that situation, though I'm glad to learn of > the per-conf exclude at the level; I wasn't previously aware it > could be used like that. Yeah, I just found that level exclude this weekend after opening this thread and it's a big step in the right direction. This feature is apparently new to version 2.*. Would have been even better if the include directive had worked there so I could externalize it. I hope this discussion has/will help others work this out. Steve