Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57179 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2010 13:03:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2010 13:03:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 46945 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2010 13:04:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 46758 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2010 13:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ivy-user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 46750 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2010 13:04:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 13:04:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.200.147] (HELO web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.200.147) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 13:04:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 65198 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Nov 2010 13:03:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1289135027; bh=X+u0I39ipJvI/dJBIOPeo0P+eDl1csIK2bjvNQL52yU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g6dpD4JAiBD3Dd2wSaP8PE8VSoLNUkbX7HvrluAbEKP8fH+LqJjGubXMndEDUuh8kJKdvKRuJCOEXzlsEE3FNHhajh3fpN7SU4VfKSByurphjJWh2p/qdfOUGZ6ZErlhdElCQT6Y0ZuszsdYk954aqDpRfMX10MuWYv6vO1JHbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ezLMJ8g6pfVMIg8m05aVrM3dp17TLXtAZfa8Tw5H2fChu5AXl1Ve78KuPE4Eg7ghprE24ohYzCeOiOxsWaky7K3jKwjYHDdWbc1BYwXNvH19sCUoNDUlONQG7ENYaU9uAvhsZg35ZGXVWgzAGY45g4WINgmnKx2uOQ9RUn4ra4s=; Message-ID: <989571.59675.qm@web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 0M2GuekVM1mCuSxjPwa5Lajw4TREvvmMeF8omTUWdEQB6lg YRhVtkd.QMiog1FPyp5JJdbc0IwkXZRmoEefJg_vVWxyFXsamwePlxKfXfE. JMdul2qxNS05n5FP85KS52bLagcr1cVfMFomzGZPEYBJ5ENhyGbjxTZFXoLd PlfOzJ.qTMNRs.H1IWR5_1RtKUfRb_uDHs_.63mqB3rN3VaiTg4uchtg_XUJ CuDszOJqfHME4ZYtEXxFAPe_IwlxdR9g9CYjs_SJ94GFkUe_bInFoENWHeF9 o1QBf1eg_gJg310gBa8qKfv8wUMNcW2Age49vn5rbHHb.GTZ8XLdFQ1YFnV3 pZuiy3RPMRKKGBnHDna28VxO_W5b9kG6GU3SD Received: from [91.177.190.217] by web30804.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 05:03:47 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/504.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.284920 References: Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 05:03:47 -0800 (PST) From: Maarten Coene Subject: Re: Setting transitive=true on one dependency results in transitive resolution for all children To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Are you sure module B doesn't has any other indirect reference to log4j through another dependency? If that is not the case, it seems like a bug to me. Could you open a JIRA issue and attach if possible a simple test scenario? regards, Maarten ----- Original Message ---- From: Carlton Brown To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Sent: Wed, November 3, 2010 2:11:47 PM Subject: Setting transitive=true on one dependency results in transitive resolution for all children I have some modules that have dependency relationships specified like this: B depends on A, transitive=false A depends on log4j, transitive=false When I change the B=>A dependency to 'transitive=true', now the B=>log4j dependency also resolves transitively, even though transitive=false for that module. This is not expected and definitely not desired... does anyone have an idea why this may be happening? Module B's ivy.xml: Module A's ivy.xml: