Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98949 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 19:15:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 19:15:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 43258 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 19:15:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 43234 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2010 19:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ivy-user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 43226 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2010 19:15:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:15:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mgitman@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.173] (HELO mail-iw0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:15:40 +0000 Received: by iwn36 with SMTP id 36so1348783iwn.4 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8zLGcEB8jssgxknxJsPzmM9HccVBZVFgbzyIdbtLQdQ=; b=bG1rw5yg0zANQbAKm+iAql2+6tWz79dnbKR1gkMWyEGAi4LSTtFFCMRwIXupZyvbZD tQYr2rxLOcWEyDr1rZm1gtX4yhps2WOi7nrVm9JRx//ghIr8rYpPbCSozwbZ5vbFvgON W80NJHvrdmHi7LCnWcjc1C1oec+vRW7irrqmM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bURHv5dJZ4isCe6uEmnT72A6AUURG3uid2BN8lgQU0Oz2JwfMyXX7MJ6xbkcRIQ0tU LbY8zh1IZCMchhgcGWBQPt55+8ySDe3Q7ymfA+mDfrhgp7qFTdPPqB7MNLYw4haMwabx 2hrtX/689ZZvV6bFOZHmy1jBdvwa0jg+DyjHI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.19.136 with SMTP id a8mr3008648ibb.86.1287774919359; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.37.203 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:15:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <331445.70294.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:15:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple artifacts From: Mitch Gitman To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00221534d7279e7fb204933976d0 --00221534d7279e7fb204933976d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Perhaps post your entire ivy.xml and someone can spot something. You would be amazed at the multitude of artifacts people have published within a single Ivy module. On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:09 PM, David Sills wrote: > Mitch: > > Thanks so much for the suggestion, but neither adding type nor conf (no > matter what setting I used of my public configurations, including "*") > made any difference whatever. This was a good idea, but I agree, it > looks as though it's only interested in the artifact that has the same > name as the module. But surely that can't be the only thing Ivy can do. > > I'd really hate to have to create a whole separate project just for 3 > Java classes in order to accommodate Ivy. The whole reason I don't care > for Maven is that it dictates too much of my project behavior - that's > what interested me in Ivy in the first place. > > Any other notions? Anyone? > > David Sills > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mitch Gitman [mailto:mgitman@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 12:29 PM > To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org > Subject: Re: Multiple artifacts > > My guess is what's going on is it's settling into a default behavior > where > it's just publishing the artifact that has the same name as the module. > > What I notice about your artifact elements that's a little off is that > they're not specifying a type attribute or (this may be the real > problem) a > conf attribute. Try: > > > > > > This is presuming you're specifying a conf literally called "default". > > --00221534d7279e7fb204933976d0--