ant-ivy-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Harrigan <dharri...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Strange IvyDE issue
Date Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:58:02 GMT
Hi Andrew,

Thank you for that :-)

-=david=-

On 27 October 2010 12:46, Andrew Thorburn <nzipsi@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could use overrides to explicitly set the version (probably to
> 1.1). See http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/ivyfile/override.html
> for more on that.
>
> - Andrew
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:38 PM, David Harrigan <dharrigan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, what do I do if the module is a 3rd party lib that hasn't defined
>> the version? As a workaround, I've done this:
>>
>> <exclude org="activation" name="activation"/>
>>
>> Since, somewhere else, an attempt is made by another 3rd party module
>> to pull in "javax.activation/activation" which is cool.
>>
>> Is the only think I can do is use the workaround?
>>
>> -=david=-
>>
>> On 27 October 2010 10:34, Maarten Coene <maarten_coene@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> My guess is that it this module didn't define which version of activition is
>>> needed.
>>> If the revision isn't defined, ivy will default the revision to something like
>>> "working@local-hostname".
>>>
>>> Maarten
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: David Harrigan <dharrigan@gmail.com>
>>> To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
>>> Sent: Wed, October 27, 2010 10:59:40 AM
>>> Subject: Strange IvyDE issue
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm having an issue with the latest version of IvyDE
>>> (2.1.0.201008101807-RELEASE) in Eclipse. A module is attempting to
>>> pull in activation, yet, I keep on getting this error:
>>>
>>> Some projects fail to be resolved
>>> Impossible to resolve dependencies of fu#bar;0.1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> unresolved dependency: activation#activation;working@PC-738: not found
>>>
>>> You can see that it's attempting to use my local machine, plus what is
>>> this "working" attribute?
>>>
>>> It's causing the resolve to fail.
>>>
>>> Any ideas anyone?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> -=david=-
>>>
>>> --
>>> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
>>> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
>>>
>>> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
>>> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
>>> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
>> Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
>>
>> "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
>> program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
>> right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
>>
>



-- 
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9

"It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the
program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design
right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.

Mime
View raw message