From ivy-user-return-7077-apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Wed Aug 11 18:19:42 2010
Return-Path: <ivy-user-return-7077-apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67952 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 18:19:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 18:19:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 17456 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 18:19:41 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-ivy-user-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17328 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2010 18:19:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ivy-user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ivy-user-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ivy-user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ivy-user@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: <ivy-user.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ivy-user@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17314 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2010 18:19:40 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:19:40 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tpbrown@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.173 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.173] (HELO mail-gy0-f173.google.com) (209.85.160.173)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:19:34 +0000
Received: by gyd10 with SMTP id 10so126860gyd.4
        for <ivy-user@ant.apache.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:references:from:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=GfyHyO5R11Nl/wzNQhux80lhl2AVgHV0xzrvF1AOPWw=;
        b=rHa0rAIF7MYQ+PqWa/YD6ElK8mhEndL8nTkJlmAdiILnIxRS6LT3qu5khr3I9nFPGG
         ZhgxeOiWSDBrpKCH1tm1FzpQ0058jk+ST/e1tJUGMIzfIC2J9yPnNLoeGtPlTJ8tUXpv
         ufKDM6Ygx7xrRZJ+OJCVYSxWxTOjLlUsX1dLU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=references:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=C2Qcmuy0ZYBYqPeXKy4YuK60BsZJAU6aFJoQ90BOo7wHYRXQN790fb8/I65U6JIc0O
         GDDJSR3bum5oGi1tgnhF09Yb3BWfp1O8vjvwWgQz+dUXZTCn+gsn3KGKOxoncD7cCaQQ
         3cGVgKyZq9mY2aia3WJ87TZ796EpFuNRjyfQA=
Received: by 10.150.214.21 with SMTP id m21mr21986710ybg.143.1281550752880; 
	Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
References: <88D56790-DCC0-43DC-83FF-F98E991A3BB0@gmail.com>
From: Tim Brown <tpbrown@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88D56790-DCC0-43DC-83FF-F98E991A3BB0@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7D11)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:19:06 -0700
Message-ID: <9043788757061218069@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: Looking for suggestion on publishing artifacts for different 
	environments
To: "ivy-user@ant.apache.org" <ivy-user@ant.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Apologies for not answering your specific question, but...

Don't do that!

Externalize your configuration and produce a single binary for all
environments.

Your build and deploy processes will be simpler and quicker.

On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Simon Lin <noisebar@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I wonder what's the best practice to publish artifacts for different
> environments such as dev, QA and production.  I tried to use extra
> attribute.  But it doesn't seem to work.  Or should I just publish
> to different directories on the repository?
>
> Thanks.