ant-ivy-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mitch Gitman <>
Subject Re: sources as conf or type
Date Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:08:07 GMT
Stephen, thanks for verifying this.

My apologies for sharing that erroneous information. I think I confused that
perceived--and nonexistent--limitation for the new strict rule introduced
with IvyDE 2.0.0 beta1 where the source artifacts have to be declared in the
ivy.xml to get picked up--regardless of whether they're in the same conf as
the associated binaries.

I would still go with the "make source a type" approach rather than the
"make source a conf" approach, but certainly the latter approach is
perfectly valid.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Stephen Haberman

> Mitch Gitman wrote:
> >
> > MG: P.S. There's one assumption I've been working from when it comes to
> > IvyDE, and I'm confident someone will be kind enough to correct me if I'm
> > wrong in this assumption. It's that IvyDE will only allow Eclipse to
> > automatically open the source for dependencies *if the source belongs to
> > the
> > same Ivy conf as the associated binary*.
> >
> Perhaps IvyDE used to have that limitation, but currently I have a 3rd
> party
> library with separate default/sources confs and it is hooking up the source
> just fine.
> - Stephen
> --
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the ivy-user mailing list archive at

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message